Activist Steve Sheffey published a new op-ed on The Huffington Post expanding upon Illinois Senate Candidate Representative Mark Kirk’s (R-IL) mixed record regarding a host of issues close to the hearts of Jewish voters. Sheffey, who is one of Kirk’s constituents, wrote:
Kirk is particularly good at manipulating the emotions of pro-Israel voters. He spoke at my synagogue a couple of years ago, and even I almost applauded. But when both candidates have essentially the same position on Israel, we should vote based on where the candidates clearly differ. Both candidates support Israel. Both parties support Israel. Why? Because the American people support Israel and recognize the shared values that tie our countries together.
The fate of the U.S.- Israel relationship does not hinge on Mark Kirk, and it never has. We should not let anyone manipulate our legitimate concerns about Israel to win an election. The Senate is fine on Israel without Kirk, and it will continue to be fine on Israel whether Kirk wins or loses.
But Kirk’s other stances are cause for concern. You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows—if you’re Mark Kirk, all you need is a pollster. As Giannoulias has noted, ‘Like a weather vane, Mr. Kirk’s votes on the issues can be predicted by the direction the political winds are blowing at this time’ ...”
Sheffey then dissected each of Kirk’s positions on issues, including:
Sheffey concluded:
Kirk’s record is not a ‘moderate’ voting record, at least not when it comes to the key votes—it’s a right-wing Republican voting record that contrasts with the mostly moderate rhetoric Kirk employed when running for re-election in the Tenth District. If you’re a pro-Israel Republican, then Kirk’s your guy.
But if you’re a pro-Israel independent or a Democrat, if you’re glad the Bush/Cheney years are over, you might want to think again before voting for Mr. Kirk.
Not wise to talk about the opponent almost exclusively without describing your own candidate, particularly when a few of your points are good reasons to support Kirk. Better to show why Alexi is the better man for the Senate.
You are 180 degrees base with your statement that both parties are essentially the same on Israel. It is uncontavertable that Mark Kirk, in his capacity as high ranking reserve naval officer, is almost singularly responsible for Israel obtaining real time US satellite early warning of missile attacks as well as the stationing of American troops in Israel operating the x-band radar which vastly increases the range and accuracy of the Arrow anti-missile.