Bookmark and Share
Printer Friendly

Rothman: Gingrich, Romney, & Perry “Should Know Better” than to Start Israel’s Aid at Zero

David Streeter — December 2, 2011 – 11:17 am | Election 2012 | Foreign Policy | GOP Presidential Candidates 2012 | Israel | Republicans Comments (0) Add a comment

Representative Steve Rothman (D-NJ) wrote in The Hill that Republican presidential candidates former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA), former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, and Texas Governor Rick Perry “should know better” than to start aid to Israel at zero. Rothman wrote:

Our foreign aid to Israel is essential to US national security interests and is a strategic investment in keeping America safe.

Since the U.S. under President Harry Truman recognized the Jewish State of Israel 11 minutes after its declaration of independence in 1948, every single U.S. president has supported foreign aid to Israel. Most recently, the U.S. and Israel signed a 10-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to provide Israel with $30 billion in military aid by 2018, which has been fully and completely supported by President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama….

In stark contrast to President Obama’s further, unprecedentedly high level of foreign aid to Israel, leading Republican presidential candidates have called for foreign aid to every country to ‘start at zero.’ In fact, when Governor Rick Perry said at a recent Republican foreign policy debate that the foreign aid for ‘[e]very country would start at zero,’ former Governor Mitt Romney said ‘I agree with Governor Perry. Start everything at zero.’ Former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, also endorsed Perry’s vision. This not only totally disregards the MOU both of our countries signed in 2007, but shows a serious lack of understanding of the importance of our commitment to Israel.

If we can’t count on Gingrich, Romney, and Perry to stand up for Israel on the national stage of a Republican debate, how do we know they will be with Israel on the international stage as president? Anyone seeking to be the president of the United States must reaffirm our commitment to the MOU and the safety and security of Israel. The Jewish State of Israel should not have to worry about a US president who wants to start Israel’s aid at zero….

The idea of starting US aid to Israel at zero is hurtful to the safety and security of the Jewish State of Israel and undermines America’s national security interests. Now is a time to build on our unprecedented US-Israel defense and intelligence alliance even further, not weaken it. Former Speaker Gingrich, former Governor Romney, and Governor Perry should know better.

In addition to criticizing Gingrich, Romney, and Perry, Rothman explained the tremendous strategic benefits that come from America’s robust security relationship with Israel:

Israel’s value to America’s national security has already been proven. In fact, calculating the military and strategic benefits to the US-Israel relationship, America’s foreign aid to Israel is a bargain. For just about two percent of what the US spent in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan last year, Americans can clearly see the return on our investment in aid to Israel.

Because of Israel’s military and intelligence capabilities, democratic values, and location in such a dangerous region - on the Mediterranean, proximate to the Suez Canal, with quick access to all parts of the Middle East, and vast experience fighting terrorists - Israel is like an aircraft carrier of democracy, freedom, and strength in a sea of dictatorships, theocracies, and terrorist-challenged monarchies.

In that dangerous region, there is no greater enemy to the national security interests of the US and Israel than Iran and its reckless pursuit of nuclear weapons. Recently, the public has seen the extent of US-Israel cooperation - overt and covert. It has been reported that our two countries have taken numerous joint operations to disrupt Iran’s efforts and, in the words of President Obama, ‘we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.’...

The consequences of a nuclear armed Iran would be catastrophic and we have no better ally than Israel in our fight to prevent the deranged President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from achieving his dream of nuclear weapons.

Click here to read Rothman’s full piece. 

Comments

There are no comments for this entry

Add a Comment
Note: This form does not support AOL's browser. If you are currently using AOL's browser, please use a major browser, such as Firefox, Safari, Chrome, or Internet Explorer.